Success or Fulfillment?

The below excerpt is from a Wonder With Us Vol.4 interview with the current U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy. Vivek makes an insightful distinction between success, and fulfillment. He attributes the triad of fame, fortune, and power to the generally understood idea of success. He attributes the triad of relationship, service, and purpose to fulfillment. It is a distinction that has important ramifications for education:

“You’ve mentioned that Mister Rogers is a role model to you. Can you tell us more about that?”

Fred Rogers was, and continues to be, an inspiration. He reminded us what really matters in life — the stuff that we perhaps don’t think about as much, or that just gets papered over sometimes in the busyness of day-to-day life.

One of the things that has been on my mind as I talk to young people around the country is that they feel like they’re caught in the proverbial rat race. I ask students: “What is the version of success that society is telling you you have to pursue? What defines it?” And they usually say some combination of money, fame, and power. If you’re able to acquire all three of those in your life — well, you’ve really made it.

But if you think about it, what all of us want for our kids is that at the end of the day — regardless of what profession they choose or how much money they make, — we want them to be fulfilled. We want our kids, ultimately, at the end of their lives, to be able to say, “That was a good life.” And that triad of success that society has told them to focus on — fame, fortune, power — I think is actually the wrong triad. I think there’s a different triad for fulfillment: relationships, purpose, and service.

Our engagement in these three things is what fundamentally drives whether or not we are fulfilled or not in our life. And one of the things I love about Fred Rogers is that he helped us see that relationships really do matter, that helping other people is important, and that building your life — even as a child — around the notion that you can contribute something to other people’s lives or the world really can make a difference.

I actually think this is what kids — fundamentally, at a deep level — want, too. They know the value of service. When kids engage in service to each other, a lot of times, they will say they feel better doing it. When they have friendships where they can really be themselves and be there for other people, they know that feels good, too. So, I would love for us to think collectively about how that can be a more explicit part of the culture that we build, the initiatives that we create, and the curricula that we design.”

(Excerpt link:

The fulfillment triad is explicitly at the heart of the cultural renewal that is the mission of Waldorf education. When I came across Vivek’s interview it brought to mind observations made by teachers who regularly taught Waldorf graduates who moved on after 8th grade to local high schools. The comments below were published by AWSNA, The Association of Waldorf Schools of North America.

“A 2005 survey of some Waldorf graduates indicated that the typical Waldorf student goes into the world with a love of learning, the ability to think independently, a commitment to human relations, an interest in and concern for other human beings and for the natural environment, and a desire to make the world a better place.”

“Waldorf students share certain common characteristics. They are often independent and self-confident self starters. They have genuine optimism for the future. They also tend to be highly ethical and are compassionately intelligent. They keep their sense of wonder about learning and the interdisciplinary sense that everything is connected.  They seem to have a healthy measure of emotional intelligence. They are both artistic and practical. They seem to know intuitively how to do many things.”

“Marin, Ca. Waldorf students to me are interesting people. They can converse intelligently on almost any issue because they have been taught to examine. They can be enormously sympathetic to almost anyone’s plight because they have been taught to tolerate. They can gracefully dance or score a goal because they have been taught to move. They can circulate among the various groups on campus and engage in a variety of activities because they have been taught to harmonize.”

Written by Gesine Abraham 2024

What makes Waldorf education so enduring and relevant more than 100 years after its inception?

“We shouldn’t ask: what does a person need to know or be able to do in order to fit into the existing social order?  Instead we should ask: what lives in each human being and what can be developed in him or her?  Only then will it be possible to direct the new quality of each emerging generation into society.  The society will become what young people, as whole human beings, make out of the existing social conditions.  The new generation should not just be made to be what the present society wants it to become.”  Rudolph Steiner (Founder of Waldorf Education)
Steiner’s life work led to contributions in many fields including: architecture, biodynamic gardening, painting, eurythmy, curative education, esoteric teachings, and economics.  The connecting link between all of these endeavors is the mission of cultural renewal.  The first Waldorf school opened in 1919 which was close to the end of Steiner’s life in 1925. Waldorf education was the crown of Steiner’s life work and addresses the mission of cultural renewal at the most causal level.
If we look at education reforms over past decades, we see that various trends come and go, reflecting shifting perceived needs and values of the times.  Often, economic and or political influences play an oversized role. What makes Waldorf education so enduring and relevant 100 years after it’s inception is that the goal is, in the words of the Waldorf educator, Rahima Baldwin Dancy, “not to inculcate any particular ideology or particular point of view, but rather to make children so healthy, strong, and inwardly free that they would become a kind of tonic for society as a whole.” The wonderful holistic, art’s integrated and developmentally appropriate Waldorf teaching methods and curriculum are valuable in themselves, but they take on deeper meaning in the context of this wider purpose.
 One of the important reasons for teachers staying with the same group of children for multiple years is to enable the teacher to truly penetrate into “what lives in each human being.”  As parents, what lives most especially in our heart is that our child’s teacher really knows our child on the level of his or her core essence.  Penetrating beyond outer or superficial personality traits to the deeper essence of the child is an acknowledged and important mandate for Waldorf teachers.
  A critical point in the Steiner quote above is that it is as “whole human beings” that the emerging generation is able to bring healthy new impulses into society.  It makes a big difference if a child’s strength— be it of head, heart, or will—is fostered in a one-sided way or in a balanced way.  It makes a big difference if a talent or gift is fostered in a spirit of gaining a competitive edge or in a spirit of contributing to the good of the whole.
Written by Gesine Abraham 2024